|
| |
De Hemelsche Leer--Part 3--
Methodological Tools for Extracting The Doctrine of the Church
Note:
This is Part 3. The special terms and phrases used in this article have been defined
in Part
1 and Part 2
where you will also find matrices 1 through 14.
Introduction to Part 3: The
Circuit of Consciousness (Matrix 15)

Birthing
the Doctrine: How Biography Recapitulates Evolution (Matrix 16)
| Stages
of Development in my own biography (Leon James) (Matrix 16) NOTE: the Links in this matrix take you to further
explanations and samples of the topics mentioned. |
DEGREES
of consciousness |
Date |
Age |
Biographical
events |
Spiritual
significance |
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL |
1938 |
1 |
Gestation and birth under wartime
and ethnic persecution. |
REMAINS INNOCENCE
OF IGNORANCE |
| 1941 |
3 |
Begin formal Orthodox Jewish
education into xenophobia and ritualized worship. |
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
SPIRITUAL |
1954 |
16 |
Begin independence from parents with
secret personal life. |
GROWTH OF SELF
LOVE OF SELF AND WORLD |
| 1962 |
24 |
Begin independence of career (Ph.D.) First
marriage in the Jewish Church. |
| 1968 |
30 |
Begin sense of moral responsibility
and integrity. Birth of son. |
| 1970 |
32 |
Begin sense of being an adult fully.
Birth of daughter. |
| 1971 |
33 |
Experiencing sense of personal power
and genius. Promotion to full professor. |
| 1973 |
35 |
Divorce and end of first marriage. |
| 1975 |
37 |
Experiencing sense of supreme
self-intelligence--"Avatar" phase. Invent new knowledge: e.g., Ethnosemantics,
Community Cataloguing Practices, Comprehensive Discourse Analysis (see
list immediately below). Meet my conjugial partner. |
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
NATURAL |
1978 |
40 |
Experiencing vastation. Feeling
inner urge toward Jewish mysticism by myself (no community contacts involved). Study Old
Testament. |
VASTATION LAST
JUDGMENT
REDEMPTION |
| 1980 |
42 |
Read New Testament for the first
time. Instant conversion by the Word. I become a "Christian Jew" or a
"Jewish Christian" -- didn't know which. Not yet a Christian. Enamored with
symbolism of Cross. |
I
N
V
E
R
S
I
O
N |
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
NATURAL |
1981 |
43 |
Baptized and married in the
Episcopal Church located in our neighborhood. Attend services, sing in choir, teach Sunday
school, study Bible Commentaries. Find Swedenborg books in library. Begin daily study of
the Writings (for details see: article 1
and article 2).
Begin my life as a Christian. Invent new knowledge: Ennead Matrix, Graphic Methodology, and
others (see list immediately below). |
SALVATION |
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL |
1983 |
45 |
Read De
Hemelsche Leer for the first time. Begin daily study of it. |
REFORMATION REGENERATION |
| 1985 |
47 |
Doctrine
of the Wife first time formulated in my mind and writing. |
| 1993 |
55 |
On 9-26-93 the realization came to
me that I need to speak about spiritual psychology in my own voice and make a case for it
rather than merely reporting what Swedenborg has said. My proposals need to be considered
on their own and justified by my understanding and perspective as a dualist scientist,
even if they are inspired by Swedenborg. |
| 1996 |
58 |
Swedenborg
Glossary started and published on the World Wide Web containing thousands of pages
written since 1981. Pre-Swedenborgian articles written between 1960 and 1980 also
published on the Web. Assumed the media role of DrDriving. |
| 1998 |
60 |
Theistic
science more explicitly formulated in my mind. Searching for how to integrate the
whole. |
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
CELESTIAL |
2000 |
62 |
Birth of the Doctrine of the Church
in my mind--now understood in a new way. Re-reading De Hemelsche Leer. For the first time
seeing the connection between my pre- and post-Swedenborgian articles (see list immediately below). Wrote De Hemelsche Leer
articles Parts
1, 2, and 3. |
INNOCENCE OF
WISDOM
REGENERATION |
| ? |
? |
? |
| |
Explanations of the above chart (matrix 16)
are given in a section below that discusses matrix 23.
NOTE: the Links in the tabulation
of discoveries below take you to further explanations and samples of the topics
mentioned.
Conceptual Categories in
Thinking in Relation to Degrees of Consciousness (Matrix 17)
| Conceptual
Categories in Thinking in Relation to Degrees of Consciousness (Matrix 17) |
DEGREES
of consciousness |
HEXAGRAM
COLOR SYMBOL |
SEMANTIC CATEGORIES
OR COGNITIVE PROPERTIES |
THINKING AND COMMUNICATION LEVEL
Community Cataloguing Practices (CCPs) |
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL |
I
WHITE |
Ideal Substance,
Spiritual Form, Essence, Nominative, Schema, Creative, etc. |
Presuppositions
(cf. etymology) |
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
SPIRITUAL |
II
YELLOW |
Structure, Connectedness, Association,
Relationship, Part, Delimitation, Plan, Script, etc. |
Implications
(cf. syntax) |
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
NATURAL |
III
GREEN |
Function,
Quality, Property, Force, Dynamics, Direction, Instruction, etc. |
Meanings
(indeterminate reference) |
I
N
V
E
R
S
I
O
N |
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
NATURAL |
IV
BLUE |
Medium, Intermediate, Context, History, Goal,
Purpose, Interspace, Intervention, etc. |
Assertion
(types) |
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL |
V
BROWN |
Frame, Role,
Venue, Guidance, Justification, etc. |
Argument
(nominal + complement) |
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
CELESTIAL |
VI
BLACK |
Appearance, Use, Performance,
Execution, Product, Accounting, etc. |
Text
(sentence, paragraph, title) |
| External=Sensual=Descending
Pathway=Light Trigram (Pre-topical) (I, II, III) |
Interior=Rational=Ascending
Pathway=Dark Trigram (Topical) (IV, V, VI) |
| Inversion=Double Line=Origin of
Contention Point |
Ethnosemantic Hexagram
in Relation to Degrees of Consciousness (matrix 18)
| From Swedenborg's Arcana
Coelestia 62. The times and states of man's regeneration in general
and in particular are divided into six, and are called the days of his creation; for, by
degrees, from being not a man at all, he becomes at first something of one, and so by
little and little attains to the sixth day, in which he becomes an image of God.
(...)
13. Those who are being regenerated do not all arrive at this state. The
greatest part, at this day, attain only the first state; some only the second; others the
third, fourth, or fifth; few the sixth; and scarcely anyone the seventh. |

The diagram above (matrix 18) shows the exact overlap between my earlier work
on ethnosemantic hexagrams (1975 see tabulation of
discoveries above) and the six degrees of regeneration in the Writings of Swedenborg
(1981 onward for me). Strangely, but significantly, I did not see the relation clearly
until April of 2001. In 1981 when I started reading the Writings it seemed to me that I
was abandoning or laying aside all my busy work on ethnosemantics that started in 1975. I
did not look at it again until I was preparing the manuscripts for scanning and publishing
on the Web in 1998. Still I didn't see it then either. Instead of the ethnosemantic system
I started working on the ennead matrix and the relation between them was not clarified in
my mind. Even today I am still searching for the relation between the ennead based on the
Writings and the hexagrammatic system I discovered before that (see tabulation of discoveries). I think the reason I see it now in April
2001 is because I just entered the interior rational phase at age 62. This article on De
Hemelsche Leer Parts 1, 2, and 3 thus marks my transition zone into interior celestial
consciousness. I can now see the Doctrine of the Church in the interior celestial sense
which brings me to an interior perception of the hexagrammatic scheme I developed in my
pre-Swedenborgian natural and sensuous thinking. I thought to myself then that this was my
own discovery and invention and attributed it all to my self-intelligence and genius. Now
I see that it was given me through the vertical community from the Lord. Yet I was unable
to comprehend what I was given to see.
For example: I saw intuitively that there was a difference between the first
trigram (White, Yellow, Green) and the second trigram (Blue, Brown, Black). But I didn't
know what the difference was in an explicit sense. I called the first trigram "the
Light trigram" and the other trigram "the Dark Trigram." I also intuited
that there was a distinct break between them and I called this break "the double
line." I realized that my some unknown way we cross this double line in the motion or
dynamic of our thinking, to create actual things or phenomena. I initially came to the
hexagram idea, that is, an orderly sequence of six steps, when I was creating clusters of
words that appeared to "hang together somehow." Here is an extract from my
lecture notes published in a Handbook for my students in 1978 (three years before I found
out about the Writings of Swedenborg) and can be found on the Web
here:
[8.1.2]
The Hexagram of Sudden Memory. Consider the following downward
series of semantic units and their usage in a sample illustration. We refer to such
semantic structures by the label hexagram to indicate that it is a whole made up of two
parts separated by a double line boundary and ordered in a vertical series. The rationale
and structure of the hexagrammatic system are elaborated further in
| I. IMPRESSIONS II. INTERPRETATIONS
III. AWARENESS |
Illustration
"It happens like this. First, you get some impression which you come to interpret,
after which you become aware you've had them" |
| IV. SELF-CONSCIOUS V.UNSELFCONSCIOUS
VI. CONSCIOUS |
"It happens like this. First you do it all self-consciously, but after
some practice you begin to do it unselfconsciously. Eventually you do it being
fully conscious." |
the Appendix and in a number of places in this Workbook (see Index).
Here, we wish to show its use or applicability in methodology.
Let us stipulate that this particular hexagram, called "The Hexagram of Sudden
Memory," is a hypothesis about the structure of the units that make up sudden
memory just as in the case of short-term memory, we stipulate discrete units
underlying the natural flow of actions and events. Having stipulated this, we can now
derive from it, a theory about what it is in the mind, since it is
not in behavior. Assume therefore that sudden memory is a parameter of the mind and that
it has the characteristics given by the above hexagram; these are as follows:
(i) every unit of mind (or gene of intellect) is a hexagram made up of two trigrams;
(ii) in this molecule, the upper trigrarn has three features in descending order; these
are: IMPRESSIONS, INTERPRETATIONS, AWARENESS;
(iii) the upper trigram can be represented in behavior as the temporal verbal report:
"First you get impressions, then you interpret them, and finally you
become aware that you have them."
(iv) the lower trigram can be represented in behavior through the following assertion:
"When you start, at first you kind of feel self-conscious but afterwards you
sort of get used to it with practice, and then you kind of do it unselfconsciously
. Eventually it becomes a routine and you're doing it fully consciously."
(v) the double line separates topical from pre-topical such that the
upper sequence is pre-topical while the lower is topical; this can be represented
behaviorally by the following verbal argument: "The SOCIO-cultural environment
creates two zones: pre-topical and topical. Pre-topical belongs to all societies whether
non-verbal, as ant colonies, or verbal, as human communities. But topical belongs only to
verbal societies. As a result, impressions, interpretations, and awareness are societal
features, not individual, hence ants may be, as a group manifesting the
phenomena of impressions, or awareness, but not individually. However, ants are not
conscious since they fail to exhibit topical phenomena."
Having assumed the above, let us now explore the consequences. First, it is provocative
to say that ants are aware and make interpretations of their impressions, though given the
new sociobiology (Wilson, 1976), the idea is no longer disrespectable! The oddity
of the assertion disappears when "pre-topical', is seen as its frame, i. e.,
the awareness of the ants is not of a topical nature, as ours obviously is, given human
language; thus we, are led to investigate the nature of a pre-topical element just as
genes provide clues to the behavior of a species or, molecular transactions give clues to
atomic structure. The hexagram we are investigating proposes that the phenomenon of
consciousness is the sixth element in a descending series of which the upper three are
pre-topical, i.e., characteristic of pre-literate and non-verbal societies or
stages of development (ontology). This leads to the provocative assertion that awareness
is pre-topical in the ontology of mind.
In behavior, ontoginy recapitulates phylogeny.; in mind, synchrony recapitulates
diachrony. The first assertion establishes the relationship between individual behavior
and the inherited gene pool of the species; it gives the biological component to
psychology. The second assertion --that synchrony recapitulates diachrony
--establishes the relationship between personal experience and the socio-cultural
environment; it gives the experiential component of psychology . Now we ask:
Is this experiential component as real and amenable to scientific investigation as the
biological component? We propose an affirmative solution though it will require a suitable
methodology, suitable for the investigation of phenomena that are non-temporal, viz.,
synchronous. The hexagrammatic approach is the original methodology of synchronic
synthesis devised by the first civilizations to invent literacy, i.e., the
community practice of publishing knowledge and indexing text. This led to books, manuals,
archives, official records (see Section [5. 2. 3] in Chapter 5). This method
survives today in the form of the treatise called the "I Ching" and attributed
to Confucius and earlier scholars of the Chinese Dynasties (circa 1100 B.C.). The I Ching
is a unified theory of social settings and presents an exhaustive system of 64 situational
hexagrams corresponding to the modalities of conduct t on the daily round (see
Section [6.3.1] in Chapter 6).
Ethnosemantic methodology (ESM, for short) requires a special register just as
statistics and experimental methodology involve specialized registers, i.e.,
vocabulary, syntax, mathematical operations abstract conceptions, formalized argument
procedures, explicitness, routine replicability, and so forth. These are essential
characteristics of any valid methodology. ESM employs a traditional and well
established system of mathematics called hexagrammatic topology. This is a term we
are proposing for what appears to have been around since the beginnings of literate
civilizations, i.e. , circa 1100 B. C. (e.g., the Chou Dynasty in China which gave us the
I CHING; the Mycennaen civilization that led to the Iliad of the Greeks; the
Egyptian Book of the Dead; the Babylonian Code of Hammurabbi). The beginnings of
literacy were understandably functional evolutionary developments: verbal but preliterate
human societies (i.e., 3, 000 years ago and beyond) were dependent on oral rituals of
transmission of knowledge, tradition, practice, and ideals. There was thus maintained by
necessity a caste system in society in which a few had the contact and conscious
relationship with the past and therefore, with the continuity in conception and in
awareness of the mechanisms of culture (For a personal view, see Yogananda, 1975;
Roberts, 1974; 1976; Rampa., 1963; Jones, 1972. For a scientific view, see Hoggart,
1957; McLuhan, 1964; Jaynes, 1976).
With the evolution of literacy as an ordinary daily round phenomenon, i.e., when
education became available to many in a community, there evolved a class of immortals
called the classicists whose ideas, words, arguments, and attitudes are perpetrated
in print and in translation and in reference, thus enduring in presence long after their
author's natural life span. The "Books of Authority" as we might call them, thus
constitute the archaeology of the objectified descriptions of the ideas of the past. They
are the data needed for the histories of ideas, nations, and people (see Lovejoy,
1955 and Cassirer, 1950).
The methodology that transforms ideas into objective data needs to be presented. ESM is
such a methodology. To illustrate its application, we present the following ennead of
basic principles about ESM.
- CONCEPTS are trigrammatic;
- DISPLAYS are hexagrammatic;
- ARGUMENTS are double hexagrams;
- THEMES are electric couples;
- DUALITY Is the double line;
- DIALECTICS is to cross the double line;
- EVENTS are dialectic movements;
- DRAMA and TALK are media for consciousness;
- ETHNICITY titles variations in the dynamic properties of a literate consciousness
(individual and local ethnographies).
The capitalized terms are technical objects, to be defined presently, and the other
terms are operational definitions. The latter may be represented through a geometric
notation system or analogy, as follows:
trigram = a composite form made up of three distinct elements, e.g., triangles;
triplets; the minimal family unit; any scale made in such a way as to have three
positions; etc.
hexagram = a composite of two distinct trigrams ordered linearly such that one trigram
assumes a lower order relative to the other trigram;
double hexagrams = a composite of two distinct hexagrams arranged in a 90 degree angle
such that one hexagram assumes the horizontal position while the other assumes the
vertical position; the double hexagram, forms a Cartesian coordinate system or
hexagrammatic matrix In which 36 dyadic intersections are specified;
electric couple = a unit of cycle consisting of a pair of two double hexagrams;
electric couples are phrasal units with a value of 48 (one double =2 hexagram s = 4
trigrams = 4 x 3 = 12; hence 2 double hexagrams = 24 and a pair of doubles = 48);
double line = two parallel lines separating the lower from the upper trigram in any
hexagram; the gap between the double lines represents the natural break between
pre-topical and topical (roughly: matter and psyche, or reactivity and consciousness)
crossing the double line = a natural phenomenon characterizing the laws of phasal
motion such that a transformation or metamorphosis is noted when crossing the double line,
i.e., the phase between the adjacent constituent parts of the upper and lower
trigrams in any hexagram; crossing from the upper to the lower is in the direction of
dissolution of topic (topical to pre-topical); from lower to upper, it is in the direction
of crystallizing topic;
dialectic movements = units of phasal values charted or plotted by reference to the
hexagrammatic positions available; e.g., crossing the double line is a dialectic movement
from phase III to IV or vice versa; similarly, going from phase I at one end of the lower
trigram, to phase III, the other end, is a dialectic movement;
media for consciousness = distinct channels or manifolds having the property of
retaining form or shape, and changes in these; the coding of these changes is possible in
terms of topic, topic units, and topic domains or zones;
titles = the referential labeling that identifies a category of event, process,
relationship, or experience; titles may be conventional or neologistic; e.g.
"bread' and "eating bread with meals" are conventional topic nominals
recognizable through the cataloguing practices of a community; "eating bread and
thinking that I shouldn't" is a neologistic topic nominal constructed according
to standardized register principles or norms;
Thus far we have specified the operational definitions of the main
components of ESM. Now let us introduce some basic technical terms. These are the
conceptual elements that enter into the mathematics or geometry of the notation system of
ESM. |
It's clear from the above that I had an insight regarding the relationship
between consciousness, semantic organization, and discourse. I saw that discourse (or
dialog or composition) by an individual was the outcome of prior inner processes that were
rational and cultural so that we shared them within a population. This became in my mind
the basis for coming up with the notion of "genetic culture" (see tabulation of discoveries above). I believed that we
can discover the mental genotypes of the human race by this kind of
"ethno-semantics." I also thought of ways to describe "discourse
thinking" in terms of formal rules (algebraic or geometric) that specified the
permissible combinations of hexagrammatic elements. These combinatorial rules were logical
and involved the traditional (Aristotelian) idea that argument=nominal + complement. I
recognized that discourse or dialog depends on invisible (Light Trigram--Descending
Pathway) and visible elements (Dark Trigram--Ascending Pathway, as shown above in matrix 18). The invisible elements I called
"pre-topical" and the visible "topical." Between the two lay the
double line which I identified as the source of the contention point in discourse and in
discourse thinking. It answered the question: What's the point in saying this or thinking
this?
Now I can recognize the overlap between the pre-topical Light Trigram and the
Descending Pathway of degrees of consciousness as outlined in the various matrices in Parts 1 and
2 of this article, and also the topical Dark Trigram and the Ascending Pathway.
It's quite remarkable to me that the "double line" between the trigrams occupied
my mind in mysterious ways. I saw it as a deep chasm in our semantic system and called it
the origin of contention points, that is, the motive for speaking and thinking anything.
Now I can see from the Writings that this double line is called the Inversion and is
described in great detail in Arcana
Coelestia where the inner sense is given for the migrations and encounters of Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob detailed in Genesis. This is the basis of what I call today
"spiritual geography." Most of the Arcana
Coelestia is a handbook for consciousness raising detailing the step by step recursive
series of regeneration as we become spiritual and full human beings. It turns out that the
hexagrammatic and enneadic systems in ethnosemantics provides us with a methodology for
drawing spiritual maps of the human mind. It is a methodology for spiritual geography, or
the science of regeneration and human growth in consciousness.
See other Applications of the Hexagram in these sources: directory 1 ||
directory
2 || article
3 ||
| From Swedenborg's Arcana
Coelestia 4. While the mind
cleaves to the literal sense alone, no one can possibly see that such things are contained
within it. Thus in these first chapters of Genesis, nothing is discoverable from the sense
of the letter other than that the creation of the world is treated of, and the garden of
Eden which is called Paradise, and Adam as the first created man. Who supposes anything
else? But it will be sufficiently established in the following pages that these matters
contain arcana which have never yet been revealed; and in fact that the first chapter of
Genesis in the internal sense treats in general of the new creation of man, or of his
regeneration, and specifically of the Most Ancient Church; and this in such a manner that
there is not the least expression which does not represent, signify, and enfold within it
these things. |
The Writings describe the Descending Pathway (Zones 1 through 9 in the matrices
in Parts
1 and 2) as involving the immediate (unconscious) influx of Divine Good into our
sensuous consciousness, and this good unites itself with the Divine truth that enters
through efflux from outside our senses, that is, through the Word and Doctrine based on
the Word. But the Ascending Pathway (Zones 10 through 18 in the matrices in Parts 1 and
2) is described as involving mediate (conscious) influx of Divine Truth into our
rational consciousness. When we advance in regeneration and our rational consciousness
develops, it does so within the sensuous consciousness that was prepared for it through
the consummation of the Descending Pathway. This uniting of the sensual and rational
consciousness is called the Marriage of Good and Truth. This marriage of good and truth is
the basis of all created things, both human and non-human. Every created object or
quality, such as a galaxy, molecule, grain of sand, plant seed, or a human feeling, is
created into a marriage of good and truth without which no thing can be anything in
existence or reality. These are the two fundamental issues when considering any created
thing or object:
- What is the good in it? (refers to its properties or uses--as in, What is it
good for?))
- What is the truth in it? (refers to its structure and conditions for being
effective or operational--as in, How does it work?
The Psycho-Dynamics of
Regeneration: Using Spiritual Geography Maps
The growth of every individual's consciousness is a process under Divine
management called "regeneration." This process is the marriage of good and truth
within us, a marriage the Writings call the church--not capitalized to distinguish it from
the Church, which refers to civilization or age, viewed historically or in evolution. The
chief mechanism by which regeneration proceeds is through an appropriate series of
temptations. These are situations and dilemmas in our daily living that challenges us by
putting us in the very middle of a spiritual battle going on between evil spirits and good
spirits. This vertical community is a constant environment for our mind without which the
mind quickly sinks into its lowest corporeal state and is there isolated from higher
states--this is called the hells. So our vertical community ensures that we can maintain
the growth of the mind by placing into our sensuous consciousness the content of the
temptation. On the one side, from below, we feel the tug of war downward to our selfish
and egocentric love of self and the world; on the other side, from above, we feel the tug
of war upward to our conscience and altruistic motivations. We are poised between the two
and kept in balance in a delicate and precise manner by the Lord. Upon the outcome of our
free choice hangs our fate in the afterlife--whether it is to be in hell or in heaven. If
we choose the selfish and the worldly, our mind is tied closer to the hells. If we choose
according to the truth we know, thus according to uses and love of neighbor, we are tied
closer to the heavens. And this repeats itself many thousands of times during the few
decades in our life in the body.
To help us gain victory in temptations every individual is given conscious
truth in the Ascending Pathway of rational consciousness, as frequently explained. This
conscious truth, so vital for our development and immortal fate, is called the Doctrine of
the Church. The Word or Sacred Scripture in all religions, is the source of this Doctrine.
This understanding of Divine things, called the Doctrine of the Church, is something we
need to acquire, develop, care for. Though we can attempt to learn other people's
Doctrinal insights--their Doctrine of the Church, it only benefits us to the extent that
what we understand is genuine, not deluded by self-intelligence. Whatever genuine Doctrine
we extract from the Word remains with us and forms our spiritual environment and fate
forever. But the Doctrine is genuine only to the extent that we live our life accordingly.
We can read the literal statements expressing the insights and enlightenments of others
but we cannot understand what they are referring to until we see the Doctrinal things in
our very own mind and life. Doctrine can only be acquired through the orderly progression
of our consciousness, as portrayed in the matrices discussed in this article. To help us
in this process of Doctrine acquisition, the Word portrays the travels and adventures of
the characters that form the subject matter of Genesis (chapter 12 onward). I will share
the various spiritual geography maps that I have created, based on the explanations of
these travels and adventures given in the Writings of Swedenborg. Also, the maps created by Ian
Thompson will also be discussed.
| Embedded Recursiveness of the Circuit of Consciousness (Matrix 19) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
COLOR HEXAGRAM SUB-CATEGORY |
DEGREE OF CONSCIOUSNESS SUB-CATEGORY |
AGE PERIOD SUB-CATEGORY |
I
INFANCY
WHITE
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL |
WHITE OF WHITE |
Zone 1 EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL
OF EXTERNAL CELESTIAL |
INFANCY OF INFANCY |
YELLOW OF WHITE |
Zone 2
EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL
OF EXTERNAL CELESTIAL |
CHILDHOOD OF
INFANCY |
| GREEN OF WHITE |
Zone 3 EXTERNAL
NATURAL
OF EXTERNAL CELESTIAL |
ADOLESCENCE OF INFANCY |
| BLUE OF WHITE |
Zone 21
INTERIOR NATURAL
OF EXTERNAL CELESTIAL |
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
OF INFANCY |
| BROWN OF WHITE |
Zone 20 INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL
OF EXTERNAL CELESTIAL |
ADULTHOOD OF INFANCY |
| BLACK OF WHITE |
Zone 19
INTERIOR CELESTIAL
OF EXTERNAL CELESTIAL |
OLD AGE OF
INFANCY |
II
CHILDHOOD
YELLOW
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
SPIRITUAL |
WHITE OF YELLOW |
Zone 4 EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL
OF EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL |
INFANCY OF CHILDHOOD |
YELLOW OF
YELLOW |
Zone 5
EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL
OF EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL |
CHILDHOOD OF
CHILDHOOD |
| GREEN OF YELLOW |
Zone 6 EXTERNAL
NATURAL
OF EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL |
ADOLESCENCE OF CHILDHOOD |
| BLUE OF YELLOW |
Zone 24
INTERIOR NATURAL
OF EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL |
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
OF CHILDHOOD |
| BROWN OF YELLOW |
Zone 23 INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL
OF EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL |
ADULTHOOD OF CHILDHOOD |
| BLACK OF YELLOW |
Zone 22
INTERIOR CELESTIAL
OF EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL |
OLD AGE OF
CHILDHOOD |
III
ADOLESCENCE
GREEN
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
NATURAL |
WHITE OF GREEN |
Zone 7 EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL
OF EXTERNAL NATURAL |
INFANCY OF ADOLESCENCE |
YELLOW OF GREEN |
Zone 8
EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL
OF EXTERNAL NATURAL |
CHILDHOOD OF
ADOLESCENCE |
| GREEN OF GREEN |
Zone 9 EXTERNAL
NATURAL
OF EXTERNAL NATURAL |
ADOLESCENCE OF ADOLESCENCE |
| BLUE OF GREEN |
Zone 27
INTERIOR NATURAL
OF EXTERNAL NATURAL |
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
OF ADOLESCENCE |
| BROWN OF GREEN |
Zone 26 INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL
OF EXTERNAL NATURAL |
ADULTHOOD OF ADOLESCENCE |
| BLACK OF GREEN |
Zone 25
INTERIOR CELESTIAL
OF EXTERNAL NATURAL |
OLD AGE OF
ADOLESCENCE |
I
N
V
E
R
S
I
O
N |
IV
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
BLUE
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
NATURAL |
WHITE OF BLUE |
Zone 10 EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL
OF INTERIOR NATURAL |
INFANCY OF YOUNG ADULTHOOD |
YELLOW OF BLUE |
Zone 11
EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL
OF INTERIOR NATURAL |
CHILDHOOD OF
YOUNG ADULTHOOD |
| GREEN OF BLUE |
Zone 12 EXTERNAL
NATURAL
OF INTERIOR NATURAL |
ADOLESCENCE OF YOUNG ADULTHOOD |
| BLUE OF BLUE |
Zone 30
INTERIOR NATURAL
OF INTERIOR NATURAL |
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
OF YOUNG ADULTHOOD |
| BROWN OF BLUE |
Zone 29 INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL
OF INTERIOR NATURAL |
ADULTHOOD OF YOUNG ADULTHOOD |
| BLACK OF BLUE |
Zone 28
INTERIOR CELESTIAL
OF INTERIOR NATURAL |
OLD AGE OF
YOUNG ADULTHOOD |
V
ADULTHOOD
BROWN
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL |
WHITE OF BROWN |
Zone 13 EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL
OF INTERIOR SPIRITUAL |
INFANCY OF ADULTHOOD |
YELLOW OF BROWN |
Zone 14
EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL
OF INTERIOR SPIRITUAL |
CHILDHOOD OF
ADULTHOOD |
| GREEN OF BROWN |
Zone 15 EXTERNAL
NATURAL
OF INTERIOR SPIRITUAL |
ADOLESCENCE OF ADULTHOOD |
| BLUE OF BROWN |
Zone 33
INTERIOR NATURAL
OF INTERIOR SPIRITUAL |
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
OF ADULTHOOD |
| BROWN OF BROWN |
Zone 32 INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL
OF INTERIOR SPIRITUAL |
ADULTHOOD OF ADULTHOOD |
| BLACK OF BROWN |
Zone 31
INTERIOR CELESTIAL
OF INTERIOR SPIRITUAL |
OLD AGE OF
ADULTHOOD |
VI
OLD AGE
BLACK
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
CELESTIAL |
WHITE OF BLACK |
Zone 16 EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL
OF INTERIOR CELESTIAL |
INFANCY OF OLD AGE |
YELLOW OF BLACK |
Zone 17
EXTERNAL SPIRITUAL
OF INTERIOR CELESTIAL |
CHILDHOOD OF
OLD AGE |
| GREEN OF BLACK |
Zone 18 EXTERNAL
NATURAL
OF INTERIOR CELESTIAL |
ADOLESCENCE OF OLD AGE |
| BLUE OF BLACK |
Zone 36
INTERIOR NATURAL
OF INTERIOR CELESTIAL |
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
OF OLD AGE |
| BROWN OF BLACK |
Zone 35 INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL
OF INTERIOR CELESTIAL |
ADULTHOOD OF OLD AGE |
| BLACK OF BLACK |
Zone 34
INTERIOR CELESTIAL
OF INTERIOR CELESTIAL |
OLD AGE OF OLD
AGE |
| External=Sensual=Descending
Pathway=Light Trigram (Pre-topical) (I, II, III) |
Interior=Rational=Ascending
Pathway=Dark Trigram (Topical) (IV, V, VI) |
| Inversion=Double Line=Origin of
Contention Point |
The above chart (matrix 19) shows the components and orderly
steps of regeneration in relation to degrees of consciousness, age periods, and
hexagrammatic color code. It demonstrates the exact relations between my pre-Swedenborgian
discoveries in ethnosemantics and discourse analysis (see tabulation of discoveries above ), and the Swedenborgian system of
degrees I encountered later when first reading the Writings. The embedded recursiveness of
the growth of the mind at all levels and periods is clearly portrayed by the visual
representations.
Discovering the Ennead Matrix from the
Literal of the Writings
| From Swedenborg's Arcana
Coelestia 13. Those who are being regenerated do not all arrive at
this state. The greatest part, at this day, attain only the first state; some only the
second; others the third, fourth, or fifth; few the sixth; and scarcely anyone the
seventh.
67. CHAPTER 2 As of the Lord's Divine mercy it has been given me to know the
internal meaning of the Word, in which are contained deepest arcana that have not before
come to anyone's knowledge, nor can come unless the nature of the other life is known (for
very many things of the Word's internal sense have regard to, describe, and involve those
of that life), I am permitted to disclose what I have heard and seen during some years in
which it has been granted me to be in the company of spirits and angels.
68. I am well aware that many will say that no one can possibly speak with
spirits and angels so long as he lives in the body; and many will say that it is all
fancy, others that I relate such things in order to gain credence, and others will make
other objections. But by all this I am not deterred, for I have seen, I have heard, I have
felt.
69. Man was so created by the Lord as to be able while living in the body to
speak with spirits and angels, as in fact was done in the most ancient times; for, being a
spirit clothed with a body, he is one with them. But because in process of time men so
immersed themselves in corporeal and worldly things as to care almost nothing for ought
besides, the way was closed. Yet as soon as the corporeal things recede in which man is
immersed, the way is again opened, and he is among spirits, and in a common life with
them.
70. As it is permitted me to disclose what for several years I have heard and
seen, it shall here be told, first, how the case is with man when he is being
resuscitated; or how he enters from the life of the body into the life of eternity. In
order that I might know that men live after death, it has been given me to speak and be in
company with many who were known to me during their life in the body; and this not merely
for a day or a week, but for months, and almost a year, speaking and associating with them
just as in this world. They wondered exceedingly that while they lived in the body they
were, and that very many others are, in such incredulity as to believe that they will not
live after death; when in fact scarcely a day intervenes after the death of the body
before they are in the other life; for death is a continuation of life. |
As I started reading the Writings I came across some consistent themes, each
one a remarkable and wonderful scientific revelation. If I arrange them in a logical
sequence in my mind, I would name first, the idea of "substantive dualism." The
structure of the universe is dual: the spiritual world is "within" the physical
world--but not in space. Rather, the two worlds are linked by correspondence. Both
worlds--the physical planets when they are inhabited, and the spiritual world, have a sun
that supplies the materials in the case of the physical sun) or the substances (in the
case of the spiritual Sun) from which all things are constructed on the planets and lands.
So the big news here is the distinction our consciousness has to make about matter and
substance. Substance from the spiritual Sun acts and matter from the physical sun reacts.
Another way of thinking this is that phenomena in the spiritual world (made of substance)
is the cause ("acts on") of phenomena in the physical world ("is acted
upon" or "reacts"). All causes originate and exist in the spiritual world,
and these control or cause all corresponding phenomena in the physical world. For example,
if we observe the various instinctual physical behaviors of animals, our mind can
formulate an idea about the spiritual causes of each behavior. The Writings reveal
thousands and hundreds of thousands such correspondences, so that by studying them, we can
begin to recognize them in our mind and in our regeneration. Wait! How did I get from
spiritual-physical correspondences to the mind and regeneration??
That's the second consistent theme I came across as I read the Writings and it
is perhaps the scientific revelation that amazed me to the extreme. That's the idea that
the spiritual world and the mind overlap. In other words the mind is the spirit and the
spirit lives in the spiritual world. And the spiritual world is not existent in place and
time like the physical world where our body is. This was the answer to the mind-body
conundrum that bedevils every generation of psychologists and philosophers since
Aristotle. By Jove, I think I've got it--to quote a well known 20th century song in the
English world. Finally I understood what I've been searching for in vain all these years.
We are dual citizens. Our body exists in the physical world while our mind exists in the
spiritual world. The two are connected by correspondences. These laws of correspondences
were known to the ancients and those who were expert at knowing them were called
"wise"--thus like a doctor in Philosophy in our days (Ph.D. Degree). No doubt in
the future, science, which will be theistic, will require its Ph.Ds. to be familiar with
the "science of correspondences" no less than we require them today to be
familiar with the science of mathematics.
That the mind overlaps with the spiritual world is more than to say that our
mind, called "the spirit," lives in the spiritual world. Overlap means that when
the spiritual world is described, the mind is also described. This reality is the basis
for "spiritual geography." For example, in Swedenborg's numerous travels
"in the spirit"--which means he was conscious of what his spirit was
experiencing, he visited different societies of spirits. These are the people whose minds
were liberated from the connection to the physical body by the death of that body. He
watched thousands of people "pass on" or pass into the spiritual world which
occurs a few hours after death, upon which one awakens consciously within one's spiritual
body. The mind or spirit which was connected to the physical body, was now free to roam in
its own mental body called the spiritual body. This spiritual body is immortal and
indestructible because it is made of substances, unlike the physical body which is made of
temporary matter. We do not get into this direct sensuous consciousness in the spirit
until the connection with the body is fully broken, a process that takes approximately 30
hours. What was special in the case of Swedenborg is that he was given the ability
to be conscious in the spirit while still connected to the physical body--and this for 27
years. The purpose of this special event, which Swedenborg called the greatest miracle in
the history of the world, was to allow him to be the scientific revelator of the Second
Advent.
| From Swedenborg's Arcana
Coelestia 5. That
this is really the case no one can possibly know except from the Lord. It may therefore be
stated in advance that of the Lord's Divine mercy it has been granted me now for some
years to be constantly and uninterruptedly in company with spirits and angels, hearing
them speak and in turn speaking with them. In this way it has been given me to hear and
see wonderful things in the other life which have never before come to the knowledge of
any man, nor into his idea. I have been instructed in regard to the different kinds of
spirits; the state of souls after death; hell, or the lamentable state of the unfaithful;
heaven, or the blessed state of the faithful; and especially in regard to the doctrine of
faith which is acknowledged in the universal heaven; on which subjects, of the Lord's
Divine mercy, more will be said in the following pages. |
Swedenborg described three levels of societies he encountered in the spiritual
world. He called these the First Heaven, the Second Heaven, and the Third Heaven. The
highest heavenly societies or the Third Heaven, were inhabited by people who on earth had
their consciousness opened to the interior celestial degree. The middle heavenly societies
or the Second Heaven, were inhabited by people who on earth had their consciousness opened
to the interior spiritual degree. The lowest heavenly societies or the First Heaven, were
inhabited by people who on earth had their consciousness opened to the interior natural
degree. These three heavens had their corresponding hells. The intermediate
"space" between the lowest heaven and the first of the hells ("Lower
earth" in the spiritual world) is called the spiritual world. This organization by
degrees of the spiritual world overlaps with the organization by degrees of the mental
world, or mind (spirit). This is the basis for the method of spiritual geography in
theistic science. Matrix
12 in part 1 discusses spiritual geography and depicts the four "directions"
in the spiritual world and the character of consciousness of the inhabitants in each
region. So the human mind is organized in levels of height and our life on earth in the
physical body determines the level to which our consciousness will rise. Thereafter, our
life in eternity is an outcome of the height we achieved. Our conscious life, or self,
experiences the phenomena at the level that is active in our mind. The inhabitants of the
highest level of the mind were called celestial and their power and happiness so exceeded
the inhabitants of the second level (spiritual), that the highest of the spiritual could
not comprehend a single thought or idea from the lowest of the third level. Moreover, a
single experience as actually felt and sensed by the lowest of the celestial individual,
would annihilate the highest and best of the spiritual inhabitants, like our body would be
annihilated if brought close to the sun.
Similarly, the lowest of the spiritual inhabitants were so vastly superior to
the highest of the inhabitants in the natural heaven (first), that the inhabitants of the
natural heaven cannot comprehend a single idea of the inhabitants of the spiritual heaven.
Such is the amazing difference in our life at different levels of our consciousness. We
are not fully human until we reach the interior or rational celestial consciousness.
Spiritual geography is the science of drawing maps of the mind for the purpose of
understanding and cooperating with our regeneration. Regeneration is the process by which
our consciousness is opened to higher degrees while we are in the physical body. After we
leave the physical body we can no longer be transferred to a higher degree than what our
mind (or spirit) has been prepared for. This is why it is so crucial that we comprehend
the process of how regeneration takes place, so that we may cooperate. This cooperation is
the reciprocal conjunction with God, which is what gives us eternal life in the heavens.
As I read these themes in the Writings I was striving to acquire them as my own knowledge
so that I can think from this knowledge. Instead of thinking from materialistic knowledge
(e.g., atheistic science that gave me the Ph.D. degree), I now started thinking from
substantive knowledge, that is, knowledge from scientific revelations given by God to
humankind through a designated or specially prepared revelator. I therefore started
keeping track of the details by drawing spiritual geography maps that my wife Dr. Diane
Nahl and I started calling "the ennead matrix." We found this word in the
dictionary and it means a grid or matrix of nine elements or zones. Here is the most basic
ennead matrix we conceptualized:
THE BASIC ENNEAD MATRIX IN SPIRITUAL
GEOGRAPHY |
| |
AFFECTIVE |
COGNITIVE |
SENSORIMOTOR |
| CELESTIAL |
A3 |
C3 |
S3 |
| SPIRITUAL |
A2 |
C2 |
S2 |
| NATURAL |
A1 |
C1 |
S1 |
The vertical dimension consists of the three degrees of the mind, and the horizontal dimension
consists of the three organs of
the mind called in the Writings: the will, the understanding, and the sensory. Diane and I
used the modern social and behavioral terms: "affective" for the organ of the
will; "cognitive" for the organ of the understanding; and
"sensorimotor" for the organ of the sensory. The three degrees we translated in
our published articles as "Level 3" as the most interior in "depth" or
"internalization; "Level2" was of an intermediate depth, and "Level
1" was the most external. For example, in one article we identified the three levels
with Kelman's description of "the internalization of obedience." He defined
level 1 obedience as not internalized but due to fear from environmental or social
punishment. When there is no surveillance, obedience stops. Level 2 obedience is more
internalized and he called that "compliance" due to voluntary agreement or
strategy. Even without surveillance, we still obey because we agree with it. Level 3
obedience is the most internalized since it is based on principles we uphold that are
higher than ourselves. Even if we rather not obey in some situations, and would not at
levels 1 and 3 (like in temptations and seductions), we still obey at level 3 out of inner
higher principle. So we saw the clear relation between how the Writings describe the
celestial character and how Kelman described the psychological levels of obedience. And
similarly with other psychological levels discussed by Ericsson, Kohlberg, and others. So
we were successful in applying the idea of "internalization" or "depth of
consciousness" or "development of expertise" in many areas of daily living.
You can explore these applications in Diane's
publications and mine
that are available on the Web. But here are some examples I reproduce here:
TABLE:
TAXONOMY OF LIBRARY SKILLS AND ERRORS (see this article for
original) |
|
AFFECTIVE DOMAIN |
COGNITIVE DOMAIN |
SENSORIMOTOR DOMAIN
|
Level
3 Internalizing the library |
A3
Affective Internalization |
C3
Cognitive Internalization |
S3
Sensorimotor Internalization |
Demonstrating
support for the library perspective on society and self
(= Library Conscience and Morality versus Negligence) |
Acquiring
personal knowing and subjective intuition of a scholarly discipline, (=Disciplinary
Connection versus Lacking Connection) |
Performing
cumulative searches in one's field and promoting the library in one's life.
(= Lifelong Library Use versus Library Disuse) |
Level
2
Interacting
with the
Library |
A2
Affective Interaction |
C2
Cognitive Interaction |
S2
Sensorimotor Interaction |
Demonstrating
continuous striving and value p references favorable to the library and its system.
(=Positive Library Attitudes versus Library Resistance) |
Acquiring
objective knowing of search sequences, their analysis and synthesis.
(= Library Search Protocol versus Idiosyncratic Search Protocol) |
Negotiating
search queries and performing a single, one-time search that meets a current information
need.
(= Library Proficiency versus Library Ineptitude) |
Level
I
Orienting
to the
Library |
Al
Affective Orientation |
Cl
Cognitive Orientation |
SI
Sensorimotor Orientation |
Demonstrating
willingness to practice library tasks and maintaining selective attention.
(= Library Adjustment versus Library Maladjustment) |
Acquiring
representative knowing and comprehending library relevant distinctions.
(= Library Map and Glossary versus Library Ignorance) |
Performing
physical operations (hands-on experience, browsing and walking around) (=library
Exploration and Efficiency versus Library Avoidance and Inefficiency) |
Here is another illustration of how we used the ennead matrix in our published
articles in the atheistic literature:
TAXONOMY
OF BEHAVIORAL OBJECTIVES FOR INFORMATION SEARCHING COMPETENCE (ISC)
|
LEVELS |
AFFECTIVE
DOMAIN |
COGNITIVE DOMAIN |
SENSORIMOTOR
DOMAIN |
Advanced |
A3
Feeling Empowered |
Practicing
Documentation Routines |
| Intermediate |
A2
Being Supportive |
C2 Understanding Search
Strategy |
S2
Identifying Implicit Features |
Level 1 Basic |
A1 Showing Acceptance |
C1 Decoding Information
Displays and Terminology |
S1 Recognizing Information
Elements and Locations |
Another application on "the height of discourse" may be seen in article
1 and article
2
And now for some illustrations on how we used the ennead matrix as applied to
knowledges from the literal of the Writings of Swedenborg. A sequence of such diagrams
based on Swedenborg's analyses of the Bible passages in Genesis can be viewed in this
article on religious behaviorism.
The clearest examples can be found in this article on "the dimensions of
the mind" from which I will reproduce these examples. The three concentric
circles style of representing "trigrams" is called graphic methodology (see tabulation of discoveries above).

The graphic methodology in spiritual geography allows us to study and consider
separate elements of the ennead matrix. Above is a simple trigram. Below is an ennead
matrix arranged in three trigrams:

The advantage of the graphic method is that it presents a rational schema in a
visual sensuous image. It shows in a sensuous way how the elements or organs of the mind
are arranged "within" each other so that the outermost is the lowest and
contains the intermediate and inmost as a protective covering or containant. The celestial
mind or degree is "within" the spiritual, and this "within" the
natural. The three minds or degrees of consciousness are organic constructions that tend
to maintain a certain form by creation. For instance, in the above ennead diagram,
arranged graphically, "pleasure" is portrayed in the sensorimotor domain of the
natural mind (S1). Within this mental event (pleasure) is contained at a higher degree and
through correspondence, the mental event of "intellectual delight" which is
portrayed in the sensorimotor domain of the spiritual mind (S2). And within this is
portrayed the mental event of "happiness" in the sensorimotor domain of the
celestial mind (S3). So in order to understand the workings of the mind, we need to think
of three mental events, one within the other: pleasure (outmost), intellectual delight
(intermediate), and happiness (inmost). In terms of actual sequence, the inmost is the
origin and occurs first; then the intermediate occurs and acts as a cause; finally, the
outermost occurs and acts as an effect. Pleasure is thus really and fully pleasure, only
when it is the third step in a series starting with happiness in the affective mind
(inmost) externalizing by correspondence to the cognitive mind (intermediate) and resting
by correspondence in the sensorimotor mind (outmost). Swedenborg explicitly described this
process, for which Diane and I created this diagram (found in this article):

Later I changed the A/B/C designation to A/C/S which was easier to relate to
the trigram of Affective/Cognitive/Sensorimotor. From now on I was striving to think, not
of single concepts as I was taught in my education, but of "triadic concepts" or
semantic trigrams. In the fields where Diane and I were publishing our
articles--psychology, education, and information science, it was an entirely new approach.
We always insisted on the correct theoretical sequence of any behavior or habit unit:
Affective------->Cognitive------>Sensorimotor. Remarkably, when our articles were
quoted or referenced in the literature, they were cited for the topic of "affective
behavior" and never for the simultaneity of the A/C/S unit. It's as if this idea has
not yet entered into the consciousness of atheistic science, and so is totally overlooked
and not seen, by those who cite our articles. No doubt this powerful concept will become
basic and universal when science turns theistic. Even now, cognitive and information
science would receive a tremendous boost in effectiveness if scientists were willing to
adopt the triadic approach to concepts about human behavior.
In addition, the Writings spoke of an interior and and an exterior of the mind
at each level. Here is how I tried to depict this relationship:

Note that there is an inherent replication in the two dimensions of the ennead
matrix. The celestial degree corresponds to the affective; the spiritual degree
corresponds to the cognitive; the natural degree corresponds to the sensorimotor. Out of
this triadic sequence issues all overt behavior. Note also that the ennead matrix can be
doubled to represent its relation to the six degrees and hexagrammatic levels discussed
above and throughout this article. In that case it relates to matrix 1 in part 1
which I reproduce again here:
STAGES OF GROWTH OF THE SELF (Matrix 1) |
| AGE PERIODS |
LEVELS |
AFFECTIVE |
COGNITIVE |
SENSORIMOTOR |
DEGREES |
| Old age |
VI |
16 |
17 |
18 |
Interior
Celestial |
| Infancy |
I |
1 |
2 |
3 |
External
Celestial |
| Adulthood |
V |
13 |
14 |
15 |
Interior
Spiritual |
| Childhood |
II |
4 |
5 |
6 |
External
Spiritual |
| Young adulthood |
IV |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Interior Natural |
| Adolescence |
III |
7 |
8 |
9 |
External Natural |
I=celestial
sensual consciousness
II=spiritual sensual consciousness
III=natural sensual consciousness
IV=natural rational consciousness
V=spiritual rational consciousness
VI=celestial rational consciousness |
External=immediate
influx and sensual consciousness
(experience)
Interior=mediate influx and
rational consciousness
(as-of-self) |
| Descending
Pathway 1-5-9=sensual consciousness
Ascending Pathway 12-14-16=rational consciousness |
Putting together matrix 1 in part 1
and matrix 19 part 3 (above), we obtain matrix
20 below:
| The Basic Map for Understanding Regeneration (Matrix 20) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
AFFECTIVE |
COGNITIVE |
SENSORIMOTOR |
I
INFANCY
WHITE
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
CELESTIAL |
Zone 19
Zone 1
the affective of the external celestial |
Zone 20
Zone 2 the cognitive of
the external celestial |
Zone 21
Zone 3 the sensorimotor
of the external celestial |
II
CHILDHOOD
YELLOW
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
SPIRITUAL |
Zone 22
Zone 4
the affective of the external spiritual |
Zone 23
Zone 5
the cognitive of the external spiritual |
Zone 24
Zone 6
the sensorimotor of the external spiritual |
III
ADOLESCENCE
GREEN
SENSUAL
EXTERNAL
NATURAL |
Zone 25
Zone 7 the affective of
the external natural |
Zone 26
Zone 8 the cognitive of
the external natural |
Zone 27
Zone 9 the
sensorimotor of the external natural |
I
N
V
E
R
S
I
O
N |
IV
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
BLUE
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
NATURAL |
Zone 28
Zone 10
the affective of the interior natural |
Zone 29
Zone 11
the cognitive of the interior natural |
Zone 30
Zone 12
the sensorimotor of the interior natural |
V
ADULTHOOD
BROWN
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
SPIRITUAL |
Zone 31
Zone 13 the
affective of the interior spiritual |
Zone 32
Zone 14 the
cognitive of the interior spiritual |
Zone 33
Zone 15 the
sensorimotor of the interior spiritual |
VI
OLD AGE
BLACK
RATIONAL
INTERIOR
CELESTIAL |
Zone 34
Zone 16
the affective of the interior celestial |
Zone 35
Zone 17
the cognitive of the interior celestial |
Zone 36
Zone 18
the sensorimotor of the interior celestial |
| External=Sensual=Descending
Pathway=Light Trigram (Pre-topical) (I, II, III) |
Interior=Rational=Ascending
Pathway=Dark Trigram (Topical) (IV, V, VI) |
| Inversion=Double Line=Origin of
Contention Point |
In the chart above (matrix 2), the zones are marked in relation to the external
A/C/S units (Zones 1 through 18) and interior A/C/S units (Zones 19 through 36). This is
because each of the three domains have an external and an internal zone. For instance,
Zone 1 is the external affective of the external celestial, while zone 19 is the interior
affective of the external celestial. Every box in the chart is thus marked for two zones.
The 36 zones correspond exactly to the 36 zones in matrix
19 above. The zones in matrix 19 and matrix 20 can be identified as follows:
- Zones 1 through 18 = External A/C/S units
- Zones 19 through 36 = Interior A/C/S units
- Zones 1 through 9 = External Descending Pathway
- Zones 10 through 18 = External Ascending Pathway
- Zones 19 through 27 = Interior Descending Pathway
- Zones 28 through 6 = Interior Ascending Pathway
Now we can take a look at Dr. Ian
Thompson's formal rendition of the ennead matrix. He doesn't call it the ennead
matrix, possibly because he is a physicist and uses a more formal mathematical
presentation. At any rate, his independent extraction from the Writings and mine are
remarkably similar, demonstrating the methodology of theistic science.
Figure 8: The 9 created degrees with brief systematic
names and systematic numbering
(I added the A/C/S wording in all caps to indicate the equivalent concepts in Ian's charts
and mine).
|
AFFECTIVE
interior mind:
1. ends |
COGNITIVE
exterior mind:
2. thoughts |
SENSORIMOTOR
natural world:
3. effects |
| ends of ends: 1.1 (affections for ends) |
thoughts of ends: 2.1 |
effects of ends: 3.1 |
| ends of thoughts: 1.2 (affections for thoughts) |
thoughts of thoughts: 2.2 |
effects of thoughts: 3.2 |
| ends of effects: 1.3 (affections for effects) |
thoughts of effects: 2.3 |
effects of effects:
3.3 |
Ian calls the affective domain the "interior mind," the cognitive
domain he calls the "exterior mind" and the sensorimotor domain he calls the
"natural world." These distinctions are used in the Writings where the will is
called the interior of the mind while the understanding is referred to as the exterior or
external of the mind. The outermost of the mind is the sensory and is called the natural
mind in the Writings. Ian calls this the natural world, no doubt because the sensory mind
is formed from stimuli from the natural or physical world entering the sensory organs of
the body.
Note Ian's notation system: he uses "1" for the affective domain
where "ends" or goals exist, "2" for the cognitive domain where
"thoughts" exist, and "3" for the sensorimotor domain where
"effects" exist. Then, "ends of ends" or "affections for
ends" receives a double 1 or 1.1; next, "ends of thoughts" or
"affections for thoughts" receives a "1.2" notation, while "ends
of effects" or "affections for effects" receives a notation of 1.3.
"Thoughts of thoughts" has the notation 2.2 and corresponds to the
"cognitive of the external spiritual" which is zone 5 and zone 23 in matrix 20 above. In matrix 19 above, it is called the "external spiritual of the
external spiritual" (zone 5) or the "interior spiritual of the external
spiritual" (zone 23)--depending on whether we're addressing external thoughts (zone
5) or interior thoughts (zone 23). And so on. Continuing with this notation with one
more embedding, Ian has the following chart:
Figure 9: The 9 created subdegrees
within the exterior mind. |
interior mind:
love
1. |
exterior mind:
understanding
2. |
natural world:
effects
3. |
| Celestial, ends of ends: 1.1 |
Internal Rational: 2.1 |
Reception, effects of ends :
3.1 |
| Thoughts of ends of ends: 2.11 |
Thoughts of ends of causes: 2.12 |
Thoughts of ends of effects: 2.13 |
| Spiritual, ends of thoughts:
1.2 |
Scientific (External Rational): 2.2 |
Scientific Laws, effects of
thoughts: 3.2 |
| Thoughts of causes of ends: 2.21 |
Thoughts of causes of causes: 2.22 |
Thoughts of causes of effects: 2.23 |
| Spiritual.-Natural, ends of
effects: 1.3 |
Sensual: 2.3 |
Material effects, effects of
effects: 3.3 |
| Thoughts of effects of ends: 2.31 |
Thoughts of effects of causes: 2.32 |
Thoughts of effects of effects: 2.33 |
In the above diagram, let's take the item "ends of ends" (1.1) which
is the equivalent in my notation of "the affective of the external celestial"
(zones 1 and 19 in matrix 20 above), which are also called the
"external celestial of the external celestial" (zone 1 in matrix 19) or the "interior celestial of the external
celestial" (zone 19 in matrix 19). Ian doesn't
portray the distinction between external and interior ends or affections. His system then
continues to the third embedding "thoughts of ends of ends" (2.11) which is not
portrayed in my diagrams since they only go to two embeddings, so far. Ian's terminology
is easier to understand at this level: "thoughts of ends of ends" (2.11) is
comprehensible, though difficult, while mine would be more difficult to comprehend:
"the cognitive of the affective of the celestial" or, "the cognitive of the
celestial of the celestial," or even, "the external spiritual of the external
celestial of the external celestial" and "the interior spiritual of the interior
celestial of the external celestial, " which is hardly comprehensible. Clearly these
pioneering attempts by Ian and me about "matrix thinking" have much groundwork
to establish before people can make use of these notations as maps for their regeneration.
These things are not easy to see and my rendition and understanding of Dr. Ian
Thompson's charts may not receive the agreement of their author who wrote this in an
e-mail message after reading some of the above:
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001
From: Ian Thompson I.Thompson@surrey.ac.uk
To: Leon James leon@hawaii.edu Subject:
Heavenly, psychological and physical degrees?
Dear Leon,
(...) 1. After your idea, I call an 'ennead matrix' any nine-fold
classification (just as you call a six-fold classification a hexagram). This was after I
wrote my 'degrees' paper.
2. You say (a) "I added the A/C/S wording in all caps to indicate the
equivalent concepts in Ian's charts and mine" and (b)"The outermost of the mind
is the sensory and is called the natural mind in the Writings. Ian calls this the natural
world, ..."
(...) To me, the third column *is really the physical world*, and the
first column *is really the heavens", each in all its degrees etc. This means that
the second column, what I call the 'exterior mind', is the subject degree of *psychology*.
(...) you have taken a very simplified 'psychological' view of my enneadic
system, and ignored the facts that, as part of the whole creation, there must be heavenly
states beyond our c | |